Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.55
+30.6%

TITAN V outperforms RTX 5000 Max-Q by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V TITAN V
RTX 5000 Max-Q RTX 5000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.2929.41
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGV100TU104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203072
Core clock speed1200 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6259.2
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320192
Tensor Cores640384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA7.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.55
+30.6%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 34.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+30.6%
RTX 5000 Max-Q 13113

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+29.6%
108
−29.6%
1440p152
+130%
66
−130%
4K82
+82.2%
45
−82.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p21.42no data
1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 94
+0%
94
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Valorant 161
+0%
161
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 108
+0%
108
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 94
+0%
94
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 176
+0%
176
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 141
+0%
141
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
World of Tanks 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 98
+0%
98
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 51
+0%
51
+0%

This is how TITAN V and RTX 5000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 30% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 130% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 82% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.55 34.12
Recency 7 December 2017 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

TITAN V has a 30.6% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 5000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
vs
R9 280X2 Radeon R9 280X2
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
vs
R5E Mobile Graphics Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics
GTX 1070 Ti 1070 Ti
vs
GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 780 Ti Engineering Sample
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
R9 280X2 Radeon R9 280X2
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4530 Mobility Radeon HD 4530
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
FX 5800 GeForce FX 5800
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
R9 280X2 Radeon R9 280X2
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3295 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 48 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.