ATI Radeon IGP 320 vs TITAN RTX

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN RTX and Radeon IGP 320, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN RTX
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
42.20
+421900%

TITAN RTX outperforms ATI IGP 320 by a whopping 421900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking721542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.12no data
Power efficiency11.96no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTU102RS100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 December 2018 (6 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608no data
Core clock speed1350 MHz160 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Wattno data
Texture fill rate509.80.16
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs961
TMUs2881
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN RTX 42.20
+421900%
ATI IGP 320 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
+628500%
ATI IGP 320 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD161-0−1
1440p102-0−1
4K73-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.52no data
1440p24.50no data
4K34.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 264 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 353 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 79 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 198 0−1
Battlefield 5 163 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 342 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 79 0−1
Far Cry 5 165 0−1
Fortnite 169 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 187 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 168 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202 0−1
Valorant 348 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 118 0−1
Battlefield 5 164 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 270 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 79 0−1
Dota 2 155 0−1
Far Cry 5 156 0−1
Fortnite 176 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 186 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 153 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 152 0−1
Metro Exodus 134 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 163 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267 0−1
Valorant 336 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 78 0−1
Dota 2 148 0−1
Far Cry 5 146 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 175 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 136 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139 0−1
Valorant 236 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 134 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 157 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 114 0−1
Metro Exodus 85 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 307 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 66 0−1
Far Cry 5 134 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 157 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 45 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 134 0−1
Metro Exodus 55 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103 0−1
Valorant 300 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 97 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 33 0−1
Dota 2 146 0−1
Far Cry 5 80 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 114 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 96 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 74 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.20 0.01
Recency 18 December 2018 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 12 nm 180 nm

TITAN RTX has a 421900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
ATI Radeon IGP 320
Radeon IGP 320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 826 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon IGP 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN RTX or Radeon IGP 320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.