Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs TITAN RTX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN RTX with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

TITAN RTX
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
49.06
+362%

TITAN RTX outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64436
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.11no data
Power efficiency12.08no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTU102Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 December 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores460896
Core clock speed1350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Wattno data
Texture fill rate509.8no data
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs288no data
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR4
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 49.06
+362%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.62

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

TITAN RTX 49602
+639%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

TITAN RTX 35884
+644%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

TITAN RTX 177234
+366%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 38040

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD162
+363%
35−40
−363%
1440p103
+390%
21−24
−390%
4K73
+421%
14−16
−421%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.43no data
1440p24.26no data
4K34.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 166
+374%
35−40
−374%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+394%
16−18
−394%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+143%
35−40
−143%
Counter-Strike 2 141
+370%
30−33
−370%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+406%
18−20
−406%
Forza Horizon 4 351
+736%
40−45
−736%
Forza Horizon 5 179
+411%
35−40
−411%
Metro Exodus 135
+400%
27−30
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 127
+354%
27−30
−354%
Valorant 246
+500%
40−45
−500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 205
+486%
35−40
−486%
Counter-Strike 2 120
+400%
24−27
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+378%
18−20
−378%
Dota 2 153
+303%
35−40
−303%
Far Cry 5 104
+142%
40−45
−142%
Fortnite 185
+198%
60−65
−198%
Forza Horizon 4 286
+581%
40−45
−581%
Forza Horizon 5 144
+380%
30−33
−380%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+300%
35−40
−300%
Metro Exodus 118
+307%
27−30
−307%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 248
+206%
80−85
−206%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
+232%
27−30
−232%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+444%
30−35
−444%
Valorant 171
+317%
40−45
−317%
World of Tanks 270−280
+84.8%
150−160
−84.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+114%
35−40
−114%
Counter-Strike 2 110
+424%
21−24
−424%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+400%
16−18
−400%
Dota 2 148
+289%
35−40
−289%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+149%
40−45
−149%
Forza Horizon 4 242
+476%
40−45
−476%
Forza Horizon 5 143
+377%
30−33
−377%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 192
+137%
80−85
−137%
Valorant 236
+372%
50−55
−372%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 114
+375%
24−27
−375%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+714%
14−16
−714%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+400%
35−40
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+600%
9−10
−600%
World of Tanks 300−350
+380%
65−70
−380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+290%
21−24
−290%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+363%
16−18
−363%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+417%
12−14
−417%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+570%
21−24
−570%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+663%
24−27
−663%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+376%
21−24
−376%
Metro Exodus 114
+375%
24−27
−375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+422%
18−20
−422%
Valorant 192
+380%
40−45
−380%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+400%
9−10
−400%
Dota 2 134
+396%
27−30
−396%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+538%
21−24
−538%
Metro Exodus 55
+817%
6−7
−817%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 197
+393%
40−45
−393%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+486%
7−8
−486%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 134
+538%
21−24
−538%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+733%
9−10
−733%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+433%
6−7
−433%
Dota 2 146
+595%
21−24
−595%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+515%
12−14
−515%
Fortnite 90
+400%
18−20
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+679%
14−16
−679%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+400%
12−14
−400%
Valorant 105
+400%
21−24
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how TITAN RTX and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 363% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 390% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 421% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the TITAN RTX is 817% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is ahead in 34 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.06 10.62
Recency 18 December 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm

TITAN RTX has a 362% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 819 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2633 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.