GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs TITAN RTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN RTX with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

TITAN RTX
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
47.92
+142%

TITAN RTX outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking68281
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.11no data
Power efficiency12.0227.82
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 December 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081024
Core clock speed1350 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate509.895.04
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs28864
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA7.57.5
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN RTX 47.92
+142%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 19.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
+142%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

TITAN RTX 49602
+274%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

TITAN RTX 99561
+129%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

TITAN RTX 35884
+261%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

TITAN RTX 177234
+172%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

TITAN RTX 537413
+31%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD164
+169%
61
−169%
1440p103
+124%
46
−124%
4K74
+174%
27
−174%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.24no data
1440p24.26no data
4K33.77no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 264
+247%
76
−247%
Counter-Strike 2 166
+295%
42
−295%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+33.9%
59
−33.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 198
+254%
56
−254%
Battlefield 5 163
+94%
84
−94%
Counter-Strike 2 141
+292%
36
−292%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+71.7%
46
−71.7%
Far Cry 5 165
+146%
67
−146%
Fortnite 169
+39.7%
121
−39.7%
Forza Horizon 4 187
+143%
75−80
−143%
Forza Horizon 5 168
+147%
68
−147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202
+181%
70−75
−181%
Valorant 348
+92.3%
181
−92.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 118
+247%
34
−247%
Battlefield 5 164
+125%
73
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 120
+300%
30
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+20.9%
230−240
−20.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+119%
36
−119%
Dota 2 155
+30.3%
119
−30.3%
Far Cry 5 156
+152%
62
−152%
Fortnite 176
+95.6%
90
−95.6%
Forza Horizon 4 186
+142%
75−80
−142%
Forza Horizon 5 153
+240%
45
−240%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+100%
76
−100%
Metro Exodus 134
+253%
38
−253%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 163
+126%
70−75
−126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267
+271%
72
−271%
Valorant 336
+86.7%
180
−86.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160
+139%
67
−139%
Counter-Strike 2 110
+206%
35−40
−206%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+129%
34
−129%
Dota 2 148
+32.1%
112
−32.1%
Far Cry 5 146
+152%
58
−152%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+127%
75−80
−127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 136
+88.9%
70−75
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+256%
39
−256%
Valorant 236
+66.2%
140−150
−66.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 134
+94.2%
69
−94.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+129%
130−140
−129%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+245%
30−35
−245%
Metro Exodus 85
+240%
24−27
−240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.3%
170−180
−2.3%
Valorant 307
+87.2%
164
−87.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+120%
51
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+313%
16
−313%
Far Cry 5 134
+212%
40−45
−212%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+227%
45−50
−227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+194%
30−35
−194%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+200%
41
−200%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
+153%
14−16
−153%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+294%
30−35
−294%
Metro Exodus 55
+267%
14−16
−267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+312%
25
−312%
Valorant 300
+257%
84
−257%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 97
+246%
28
−246%
Counter-Strike 2 18
+100%
9−10
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+450%
6
−450%
Dota 2 146
+181%
52
−181%
Far Cry 5 80
+281%
21−24
−281%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+245%
30−35
−245%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 96
+405%
18−20
−405%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 74
+469%
13
−469%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 47
+0%
47
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 28
+0%
28
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%

This is how TITAN RTX and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 169% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 124% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 174% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Epic Preset, the TITAN RTX is 469% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is ahead in 63 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.92 19.81
Recency 18 December 2018 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 50 Watt

TITAN RTX has a 141.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 460% lower power consumption.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 820 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1735 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN RTX or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.