Radeon 760M vs T400 4 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T400 4 GB with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

T400 4 GB
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 30 Watt
9.64

Radeon 760M outperforms T400 4 GB by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking429326
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.61no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 3
GPU code nameTU117Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$216 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate34.2067.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on T400 4 GB and Radeon 760M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed10 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T400 4 GB 9.64
Radeon 760M 15.30
+58.7%

Radeon 760M outperforms T400 4 GB by 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T400 4 GB 3723
Radeon 760M 5910
+58.7%

Radeon 760M outperforms T400 4 GB by 59% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−72.2%
31
+72.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−66.7%
30
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−71.4%
24
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−71.4%
35−40
+71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−75%
40−45
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−60%
70−75
+60%
Hitman 3 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−74.3%
60−65
+74.3%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−70%
50−55
+70%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−59.3%
40−45
+59.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−70%
51
+70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−63.3%
45−50
+63.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−80%
18
+80%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−71.4%
35−40
+71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−75%
40−45
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−60%
70−75
+60%
Hitman 3 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−74.3%
60−65
+74.3%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−70%
50−55
+70%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−59.3%
40−45
+59.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−63%
44
+63%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−71.4%
36
+71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−63.3%
45−50
+63.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−71.4%
35−40
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−60%
70−75
+60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−74.3%
60−65
+74.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−76.2%
37
+76.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−64.3%
23
+64.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−63.3%
45−50
+63.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−59.3%
40−45
+59.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−75%
27−30
+75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Hitman 3 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−75%
27−30
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Hitman 3 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%

This is how T400 4 GB and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is 72% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.64 15.30
Recency 6 May 2021 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 54 Watt

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the T400 4 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that T400 4 GB is a desktop card while Radeon 760M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 54 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 108 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.