Radeon R9 M395 vs T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Radeon R9 M395, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
20.23
+58.3%

T1200 Mobile outperforms R9 M395 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking278395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.69no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN (2012−2015)
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)9 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241792
Core clock speed855 MHz834 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data5000 Million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1250 MHz
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX® 12
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno dataNot Listed
Vulkan-+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 20.23
+58.3%
R9 M395 12.78

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7774
+58.3%
R9 M395 4911

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1200 Mobile 14387
+66.2%
R9 M395 8656

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1200 Mobile 10134
+48.6%
R9 M395 6819

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1200 Mobile 50827
+32.1%
R9 M395 38490

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
1440p33
+83.3%
18−21
−83.3%
4K109
+67.7%
65−70
−67.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+63.6%
21−24
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+60%
24−27
−60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+52.4%
40−45
−52.4%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+63.6%
21−24
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
Forza Horizon 4 89
+74.5%
50−55
−74.5%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+51.5%
30−35
−51.5%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%
Valorant 80−85
+60.8%
50−55
−60.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+52.4%
40−45
−52.4%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+63.6%
21−24
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Dota 2 86
+87%
45−50
−87%
Far Cry 5 67
+36.7%
45−50
−36.7%
Fortnite 100−110
+46.6%
70−75
−46.6%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+43.1%
50−55
−43.1%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+54.3%
45−50
−54.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+42.1%
95−100
−42.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+64.1%
35−40
−64.1%
Valorant 80−85
+60.8%
50−55
−60.8%
World of Tanks 230−240
+34.7%
170−180
−34.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+52.4%
40−45
−52.4%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+63.6%
21−24
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−127%
24−27
+127%
Dota 2 107
+133%
45−50
−133%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+36.7%
45−50
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+23.5%
50−55
−23.5%
Forza Horizon 5 40
+21.2%
30−35
−21.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+42.1%
95−100
−42.1%
Valorant 80−85
+60.8%
50−55
−60.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+106%
18−20
−106%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+106%
18−20
−106%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+97.7%
85−90
−97.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
World of Tanks 130−140
+52.2%
90−95
−52.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+64%
24−27
−64%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+89.7%
27−30
−89.7%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+51.6%
30−35
−51.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+60%
20−22
−60%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+70.4%
27−30
−70.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Valorant 50−55
+62.5%
30−35
−62.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Dota 2 30−35
+47.8%
21−24
−47.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+47.8%
21−24
−47.8%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+64.9%
35−40
−64.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+47.8%
21−24
−47.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 109
+374%
21−24
−374%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Fortnite 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Valorant 24−27
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%

This is how T1200 Mobile and R9 M395 compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 69% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 83% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 68% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 374% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M395 is 127% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 59 tests (92%)
  • R9 M395 is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.23 12.78
Recency 12 April 2021 9 June 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

T1200 Mobile has a 58.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395 in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon R9 M395 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon R9 M395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.