GeForce GTX 660 OEM vs T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with GeForce GTX 660 OEM, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
19.77
+501%

T1200 Mobile outperforms GTX 660 OEM by a whopping 501% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking282744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.611.78
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)22 August 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241152
Core clock speed855 MHz823 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz888 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)130 Watt
Texture fill rateno data85.25
Floating-point processing powerno data2.046 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data179.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
+567%
9−10
−567%
1440p32
+540%
5−6
−540%
4K90
+543%
14−16
−543%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+558%
12−14
−558%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Far Cry 5 65
+550%
10−11
−550%
Fortnite 100−105
+525%
16−18
−525%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+542%
12−14
−542%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+525%
8−9
−525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+620%
10−11
−620%
Valorant 140−150
+576%
21−24
−576%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+558%
12−14
−558%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+557%
35−40
−557%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Dota 2 114
+533%
18−20
−533%
Far Cry 5 59
+556%
9−10
−556%
Fortnite 100−105
+525%
16−18
−525%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+542%
12−14
−542%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+563%
8−9
−563%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+610%
10−11
−610%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+620%
10−11
−620%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+610%
10−11
−610%
Valorant 140−150
+576%
21−24
−576%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+558%
12−14
−558%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Dota 2 107
+569%
16−18
−569%
Far Cry 5 56
+522%
9−10
−522%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+542%
12−14
−542%
Forza Horizon 5 40
+567%
6−7
−567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+620%
10−11
−620%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+517%
6−7
−517%
Valorant 140−150
+576%
21−24
−576%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−105
+525%
16−18
−525%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+552%
21−24
−552%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+517%
6−7
−517%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+533%
27−30
−533%
Valorant 170−180
+563%
27−30
−563%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Far Cry 5 41
+583%
6−7
−583%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+520%
5−6
−520%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+529%
7−8
−529%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Valorant 100−110
+569%
16−18
−569%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Dota 2 109
+506%
18−20
−506%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%

This is how T1200 Mobile and GTX 660 OEM compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 567% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 540% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 543% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.77 3.29
Recency 12 April 2021 22 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 500.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 660 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GeForce GTX 660 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 34 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about T1200 Mobile or GeForce GTX 660 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.