T600 vs T1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1000 and T600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

T1000
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
19.37
+17.5%

T1000 outperforms T600 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking289334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.2128.93
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU117TU117
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896640
Core clock speed1065 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1395 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate78.1253.40
Floating-point processing power2.5 TFLOPS1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T1000 19.37
+17.5%
T600 16.48

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 7623
+17.5%
T600 6485

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1000 11793
+35.6%
T600 8694

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1000 46318
T600 344838
+645%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1000 8450
+29%
T600 6552

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1000 50553
+23.6%
T600 40917

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

T1000 37691
+35.4%
T600 27840

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1000 398761
+30.9%
T600 304731

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

T1000 35014
+35%
T600 25930

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

T1000 37817
+42.2%
T600 26600

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+10.9%
55
−10.9%
1440p27−30
+12.5%
24
−12.5%
4K21−24
+5%
20
−5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+19.5%
40−45
−19.5%
Counter-Strike 2 45
+55.2%
27−30
−55.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+19.5%
40−45
−19.5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+16.4%
65−70
−16.4%
Counter-Strike 2 34
+17.2%
27−30
−17.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%
Far Cry 5 62
+34.8%
46
−34.8%
Fortnite 95−100
+12.5%
85−90
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+15.2%
65−70
−15.2%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+20.9%
40−45
−20.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+20.7%
55−60
−20.7%
Valorant 140−150
+10.2%
120−130
−10.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+19.5%
40−45
−19.5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+16.4%
65−70
−16.4%
Counter-Strike 2 28
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+10.2%
200−210
−10.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%
Far Cry 5 57
+35.7%
42
−35.7%
Fortnite 95−100
+12.5%
85−90
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+15.2%
65−70
−15.2%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+20.9%
40−45
−20.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+30.5%
59
−30.5%
Metro Exodus 35
+34.6%
26
−34.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+20.7%
55−60
−20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+33.3%
48
−33.3%
Valorant 140−150
+10.2%
120−130
−10.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+16.4%
65−70
−16.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24
−20.8%
27−30
+20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%
Far Cry 5 53
+35.9%
39
−35.9%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+15.2%
65−70
−15.2%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+20.9%
40−45
−20.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+20.7%
55−60
−20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+29.6%
27
−29.6%
Valorant 140−150
+10.2%
120−130
−10.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+12.5%
85−90
−12.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+15.4%
110−120
−15.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+18.5%
27
−18.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+60%
15
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+9%
150−160
−9%
Valorant 170−180
+11.3%
150−160
−11.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+61.5%
26
−61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+20.5%
35−40
−20.5%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+36%
25
−36%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+87.5%
8
−87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
Valorant 100−110
+20.7%
85−90
−20.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+66.7%
12
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 111
+0%
111
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%

This is how T1000 and T600 compete in popular games:

  • T1000 is 11% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 is 13% faster in 1440p
  • T1000 is 5% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 is 88% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 is 21% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 is ahead in 62 tests (93%)
  • T600 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.37 16.48
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt

T1000 has a 17.5% higher aggregate performance score.

T600, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the T600 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1000
T1000
NVIDIA T600
T600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 64 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 687 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about T1000 or T600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.