Radeon 740M vs T1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1000 with Radeon 740M, including specs and performance data.

T1000
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
18.95
+140%

T1000 outperforms 740M by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking285512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.3338.03
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117Phoenix
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896256
Core clock speed1065 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1395 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate78.1240.00
Floating-point processing power2.5 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs5616
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 18.95
+140%
Radeon 740M 7.91

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 7631
+140%
Radeon 740M 3184

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1000 11793
+57.4%
Radeon 740M 7490

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1000 8450
+64.6%
Radeon 740M 5135

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+176%
21
−176%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+200%
14−16
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 34
+113%
16
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+85.1%
47
−85.1%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+165%
20−22
−165%
Metro Exodus 62
+182%
21−24
−182%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+100%
21−24
−100%
Valorant 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+100%
14
−100%
Dota 2 77
+157%
30
−157%
Far Cry 5 130
+519%
21
−519%
Fortnite 100−110
+114%
45−50
−114%
Forza Horizon 4 69
+86.5%
37
−86.5%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+165%
20−22
−165%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+166%
27−30
−166%
Metro Exodus 42
+90.9%
21−24
−90.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+103%
65−70
−103%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+100%
21−24
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+148%
24−27
−148%
Valorant 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
World of Tanks 230−240
+85.5%
120−130
−85.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+118%
11
−118%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+88.6%
35−40
−88.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60
+100%
30
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+165%
20−22
−165%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+103%
65−70
−103%
Valorant 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+210%
10−11
−210%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
World of Tanks 130−140
+125%
60−65
−125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+212%
16−18
−212%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+200%
16−18
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+221%
14−16
−221%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Valorant 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Fortnite 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Valorant 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how T1000 and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • T1000 is 176% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 is 519% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 is ahead in 52 tests (85%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (15%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.95 7.91
Recency 6 May 2021 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

T1000 has a 139.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 740M in performance tests.

Be aware that T1000 is a workstation card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1000
T1000
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 64 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 86 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.