Arc Pro B50 vs T1000

Place in the ranking	332	194
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	47.43
Power efficiency	27.82	34.32
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Xe2 (2024)
GPU code name	TU117	BMG-G21
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	6 May 2021 (4 years ago)	5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	2048
Core clock speed	1065 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	1395 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	78.12	332.8
Floating-point processing power	2.5 TFLOPS	10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	56	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16
L1 Cache	896 KB	no data
L2 Cache	1024 KB	4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 5.0 x8
Length	156 mm	167 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

T1000 17.27

Arc Pro B50 29.82
+72.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 7636
Samples: 685

Arc Pro B50 13186
+72.7%

Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−66.7%

95−100
+66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.67

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	100−110 −69.8%	180−190 +69.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −66.7%	65−70 +66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy	35−40 −66.7%	60−65 +66.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	75−80 −66.7%	130−140 +66.7%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 −69.8%	180−190 +69.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −66.7%	65−70 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	62 −61.3%	100−105 +61.3%
Fortnite	95−100 −71.7%	170−180 +71.7%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −71.1%	130−140 +71.1%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −72.4%	100−105 +72.4%
Hogwarts Legacy	35−40 −66.7%	60−65 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −71.4%	120−130 +71.4%
Valorant	140−150 −70.2%	240−250 +70.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	75−80 −66.7%	130−140 +66.7%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 −69.8%	180−190 +69.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	220−230 −54.2%	350−400 +54.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −66.7%	65−70 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	57 −66.7%	95−100 +66.7%
Fortnite	95−100 −71.7%	170−180 +71.7%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −71.1%	130−140 +71.1%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 −72.4%	100−105 +72.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	77 −68.8%	130−140 +68.8%
Hogwarts Legacy	35−40 −66.7%	60−65 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	35 −71.4%	60−65 +71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −71.4%	120−130 +71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	64 −71.9%	110−120 +71.9%
Valorant	140−150 −70.2%	240−250 +70.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	75−80 −66.7%	130−140 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −66.7%	65−70 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	53 −69.8%	90−95 +69.8%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −71.1%	130−140 +71.1%
Hogwarts Legacy	35−40 −66.7%	60−65 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −71.4%	120−130 +71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 −71.4%	60−65 +71.4%
Valorant	140−150 −70.2%	240−250 +70.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

95−100
−71.7%

170−180

+71.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −71.1%	65−70 +71.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	130−140 −70.4%	230−240 +70.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −66.7%	40−45 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −71.6%	290−300 +71.6%
Valorant	170−180 −71.4%	300−310 +71.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	50−55 −69.8%	90−95 +69.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −66.7%	70−75 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −63%	75−80 +63%
Hogwarts Legacy	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −72.4%	50−55 +72.4%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

40−45

−62.8%

70−75
+62.8%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −61.8%	55−60 +61.8%
Hogwarts Legacy	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −66.7%	45−50 +66.7%
Valorant	100−110 −71.4%	180−190 +71.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	27−30 −60.7%	45−50 +60.7%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −66.7%	35−40 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%
Hogwarts Legacy	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

18−20

−57.9%

30−33
+57.9%

This is how T1000 and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

Arc Pro B50 is 67% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.27	29.82
Recency	6 May 2021	5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	70 Watt

T1000 has 40% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has a 72.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B50 is our recommended choice as it beats the T1000 in performance tests.