Arc Pro B50 vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 and Arc Pro B50, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
33.97
+13.9%

4000 outperforms Pro B50 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking155194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.9047.43
Power efficiency17.1034.32
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameTU104BMG-G21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Arc Pro B50 has 268% better value for money than RTX 4000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
Core clock speed1005 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate222.5332.8
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs144128
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores3616
L1 Cache2.3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length241 mm167 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4000 33.97
+13.9%
Arc Pro B50 29.82

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 15022
+13.9%
Samples: 1964
Arc Pro B50 13186
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.97 29.82
Recency 13 November 2018 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 13.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro B50 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 516 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 4000 or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.