SIS Mirage M661FX vs SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| GPU code name | SISM672 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 January 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 July 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 250 MHz | 133 MHz |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2007 | 1 July 2003 |
SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX has an age advantage of 3 years.
We couldn't decide between SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX and SIS Mirage M661FX. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
