SIS Mirage M661FX vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 4 (2007−2010)	no data
GPU code name	Crestline	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)	1 July 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	no data
Core clock speed	500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	133 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	13.5 Watt	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

-

+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

10

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency

9 May 2007

1 July 2003

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---