GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Riva 128

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated49
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data71.55
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV3Ampere GA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 1997 (27 years ago)1 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4864
Core clock speed100 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors4 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1253.1
Floating-point performanceno data16.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W31x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 220 Watt

Riva 128 has 5400% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 23 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva 128 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 28 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 14631 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.