Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs ATI Radeon Xpress X1250

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	no data	Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code name	RS690M	Crestline
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 February 2007 (17 years ago)	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4	8
Core clock speed	no data	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	350 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	13.5 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	no data
Shared memory	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

no data

10

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 February 2007	9 May 2007
Chip lithography	80 nm	90 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---