Arc A750 vs Radeon Vega 7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Vega 7 with Arc A750, including specs and performance data.

Vega 7
2021
45 Watt
7.19

Arc A750 outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 326% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking536180
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.51
Power efficiency11.439.75
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameCezanneDG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 April 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4483584
Core clock speed300 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate53.20537.6
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs28224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Vega 7 7.19
Arc A750 30.64
+326%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Vega 7 5249
Arc A750 37288
+610%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Vega 7 3348
Arc A750 29667
+786%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Vega 7 24726
Arc A750 130715
+429%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−374%
109
+374%
1440p25
−136%
59
+136%
4K15
−140%
36
+140%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.65
1440pno data4.90
4Kno data8.03

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−469%
91
+469%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−283%
90−95
+283%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−450%
88
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 29
−883%
285
+883%
Forza Horizon 5 18
−361%
80−85
+361%
Metro Exodus 21
−452%
116
+452%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
−144%
65−70
+144%
Valorant 29
−338%
120−130
+338%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−283%
90−95
+283%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−375%
76
+375%
Dota 2 17
−482%
99
+482%
Far Cry 5 28
−143%
68
+143%
Fortnite 40−45
−239%
140−150
+239%
Forza Horizon 4 24
−896%
239
+896%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−388%
80−85
+388%
Metro Exodus 15
−527%
94
+527%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46
−296%
180−190
+296%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−214%
65−70
+214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−370%
100−110
+370%
Valorant 14
−807%
120−130
+807%
World of Tanks 58
−376%
270−280
+376%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−283%
90−95
+283%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−369%
75
+369%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−167%
85−90
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 21
−848%
199
+848%
Forza Horizon 5 12
−592%
80−85
+592%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−203%
180−190
+203%
Valorant 25
−408%
120−130
+408%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 9−10
−356%
41
+356%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
World of Tanks 50−55
−280%
200−210
+280%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−377%
60−65
+377%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−867%
145
+867%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−373%
50−55
+373%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−682%
86
+682%
Valorant 18−20
−384%
90−95
+384%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−83.3%
21−24
+83.3%
Dota 2 18−20
−150%
45
+150%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1333%
43
+1333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−355%
100−105
+355%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−150%
45
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−389%
40−45
+389%
Fortnite 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−833%
84
+833%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Valorant 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%

Full HD
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 99
+0%
99
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+0%
57
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%

This is how Vega 7 and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 374% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 136% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 140% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A750 is 1333% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is ahead in 50 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.19 30.64
Recency 13 April 2021 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 225 Watt

Vega 7 has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 326.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook card while Arc A750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2332 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 876 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.