GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER vs Radeon VII

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking84not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.95no data
Power efficiency10.13no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 20GA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 February 2019 (5 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $1,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384010752
Core clock speed1400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1750 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate420.0569.5
Floating-point processing power13.44 TFLOPS36.45 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs240336

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length280 mm336 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB24 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz21.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s1,018 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 400 Watt

Radeon VII has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 35.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon VII and GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER
GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2855 votes

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 422 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.