UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX Vega M GL outperforms UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 460 | 558 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 10.58 | no data |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
GPU code name | Polaris 22 | Alder Lake Xe |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5,000 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 2.588 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 32 | no data |
TMUs | 80 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | HBM2 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 27−30
+28.6%
| 21
−28.6%
|
1440p | 14−16
+27.3%
| 11
−27.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset - Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Fortnite | 55−60
+39%
|
40−45
−39%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+36%
|
24−27
−36%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+28.8%
|
110−120
−28.8%
|
Dota 2 | 65−70
+28.3%
|
53
−28.3%
|
Fortnite | 55−60
+39%
|
40−45
−39%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+200%
|
12
−200%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+36%
|
24−27
−36%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+4.3%
|
23
−4.3%
|
Dota 2 | 65−70
+38.8%
|
49
−38.8%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+36%
|
24−27
−36%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+118%
|
11
−118%
|
Fortnite | 55−60
+39%
|
40−45
−39%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+100%
|
5−6
−100%
|
Dota 2 | 35−40
+40%
|
24−27
−40%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
Fortnite | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 17
+0%
|
17
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 25
+0%
|
25
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Valorant | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Valorant | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Valorant | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Valorant | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Fortnite | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how RX Vega M GL and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:
- RX Vega M GL is 29% faster in 1080p
- RX Vega M GL is 27% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega M GL is ahead in 17 tests (27%)
- there's a draw in 47 tests (73%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 9.72 | 7.01 |
Recency | 1 February 2018 | 4 January 2022 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
RX Vega M GL has a 38.7% higher aggregate performance score.
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.