RTX A2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 550X Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A4 Mobile A1000 Mobile A1000 Mobile 6 GB A2000 Max-Q A2000 Max-Q 8 GB A2000 Mobile A2000 Mobile 8 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with RTX A2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
8.79

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms M GL by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking504274
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.9518.43
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code namePolaris 22GA107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802560
Core clock speed931 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88135.0
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS8.637 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs8080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache320 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 8.79
RTX A2000 Mobile 21.62
+146%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3885
Samples: 301
RTX A2000 Mobile 9557
+146%
Samples: 1243

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−163%
79
+163%
1440p16−18
−163%
42
+163%
4K14−16
−171%
38
+171%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
−104%
110−120
+104%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−168%
90−95
+168%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−77.6%
250−260
+77.6%
Dota 2 65−70
−113%
145
+113%
Fortnite 55−60
−104%
110−120
+104%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−203%
106
+203%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−168%
90−95
+168%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−284%
96
+284%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
−89.7%
129
+89.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−168%
90−95
+168%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−100%
50
+100%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−104%
110−120
+104%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−120%
44
+120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−230%
33
+230%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
−106%
72
+106%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−178%
24−27
+178%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−178%
24−27
+178%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50
+0%
50
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 163% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 163% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 171% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 284% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile performs better in 17 tests (26%)
  • there's a draw in 49 tests (74%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.79 21.62
Recency 1 February 2018 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 46.2% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 146% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 965M GeForce GTX 965M
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Tesla P100 SXM2 Tesla P100 SXM2
vs
A16 PCIe A16 PCIe
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
R5 430 OEM R5 430 OEM
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
RTX 3070 Ti RTX 3070 Ti
RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GH
vs
Radeon 680M 680M
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
Quadro P520 P520
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
R7 350 640SP R7 350 640SP
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
Arc 7 A780 Arc 7 A780
HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
vs
Playstation 5 Pro GPU Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Quadro GV100 GV100
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 115 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or RTX A2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.