Radeon Pro W6600M vs RX Vega M GL

Place in the ranking	447	208
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	10.74	20.92
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 February 2018 (7 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	1792
Core clock speed	931 MHz	1224 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	2034 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	90 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	227.8
Floating-point processing power	2.588 TFLOPS	7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	80	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 9.47

Pro W6600M 25.54
+170%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3902

Pro W6600M 10525
+170%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite	55−60 −154%	150−160 +154%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −169%	210−220 +169%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 −158%	90−95 +158%
Fortnite	55−60 −127%	130−140 +127%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −156%	90−95 +156%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −113%	160−170 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −190%	90−95 +190%
World of Tanks	140−150 −83.4%	260−270 +83.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2	35−40 −158%	90−95 +158%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −113%	160−170 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −158%	80−85 +158%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

55−60
−154%

150−160

+154%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −140%	45−50 +140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −140%	45−50 +140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2	20−22 −140%	45−50 +140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −159%	75−80 +159%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

10−12

−145%

27−30
+145%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
World of Tanks	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Dota 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Fortnite	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 190% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro W6600M is ahead in 11 tests (17%)
there's a draw in 52 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.47	25.54
Recency	1 February 2018	8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	90 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 38.5% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 169.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.