GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded Radeon Vega 3 Efficient Radeon Vega 6 Embedded Radeon Vega 8 Efficient Radeon Vega 8 Embedded Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 675M GTX 675M SLI GTX 675MX GTX 675MX Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 with GeForce GTX 675M SLI, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.36

GTX 675M SLI outperforms RX Vega 11 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
GTX 675M SLI GTX 675M SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking616505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.752.98
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRavenN12E-GTX2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704768
Core clock speed300 MHz620 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2x 100 Watt
Texture fill rate55.04no data
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs44no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared3000 MHz
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 11 5.36
GTX 675M SLI 8.48
+58.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 11 5483
GTX 675M SLI 6407
+16.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
1440p6
−50%
9−10
+50%
4K12
−50%
18−20
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Battlefield 5 31
−16.1%
35−40
+16.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Far Cry 5 19
−36.8%
24−27
+36.8%
Fortnite 86
+75.5%
45−50
−75.5%
Forza Horizon 4 38
+5.6%
35−40
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−45%
27−30
+45%
Valorant 60−65
−32.3%
80−85
+32.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Battlefield 5 26
−38.5%
35−40
+38.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−45.5%
120−130
+45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Dota 2 46
−32.6%
60−65
+32.6%
Far Cry 5 18
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%
Fortnite 31
−58.1%
45−50
+58.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Metro Exodus 9
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−45%
27−30
+45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 60−65
−32.3%
80−85
+32.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 25
−44%
35−40
+44%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Dota 2 42
−45.2%
60−65
+45.2%
Far Cry 5 17
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Forza Horizon 4 29
−24.1%
35−40
+24.1%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−45%
27−30
+45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−110%
21−24
+110%
Valorant 60−65
−32.3%
80−85
+32.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−58.1%
45−50
+58.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−59%
60−65
+59%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−23.5%
40−45
+23.5%
Valorant 55−60
−61.4%
90−95
+61.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Valorant 24−27
−61.5%
40−45
+61.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how RX Vega 11 and GTX 675M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 675M SLI is 43% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 675M SLI is 50% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 675M SLI is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 11 is 76% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • GTX 675M SLI is ahead in 61 test (91%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.36 8.48
Recency 10 May 2018 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 675M SLI, on the other hand, has a 58.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 1650% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
Quadro P3200 P3200
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX 3000 Max-Q RTX 3000 Max-Q
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
HD Graphics 5600 HD Graphics 5600
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
HD 6290 HD 6290
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
Go 7600 Go 7600
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
RX 580X 580X
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
RX Vega 24 Mobile Vega 24 Mobile
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
Pro 580X Pro 580X
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11
vs
RX 5800 XT 5800 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 1828 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or GeForce GTX 675M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.