RTX A2000 Max-Q vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking82not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.18no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100GA106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Core clock speed1200 MHz682 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1207 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate465.696.56
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS6.18 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs32080
Tensor Cores64080
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA7.08.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2017 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 95 Watt

TITAN V has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 163.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN V and RTX A2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while RTX A2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
RTX A2000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3285 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.