Quadro M3000M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 470 Mobile RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M1000M M1200 M2000M M2200 M3000M M4000M M5000M M5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro M3000M, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.39

M3000M outperforms M GL by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
M3000M M3000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking503417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.1113.58
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 22GM204
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)18 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801,024
Core clock speed931 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8867.20
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8064
L1 Cache320 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-5.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 9.39
M3000M 13.25
+41.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3926
Samples: 314
M3000M 5543
+41.2%
Samples: 513

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−50%
60
+50%
4K16−18
−56.3%
25
+56.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
−35.1%
75−80
+35.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−44.1%
45−50
+44.1%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−29.2%
180−190
+29.2%
Dota 2 65−70
−27.5%
85−90
+27.5%
Fortnite 55−60
−35.1%
75−80
+35.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−40%
49
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−44.1%
45−50
+44.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−68%
42
+68%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
−27.5%
85−90
+27.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−44.1%
45−50
+44.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+13.6%
22
−13.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−35.1%
75−80
+35.1%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−75%
35
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−27.3%
14
+27.3%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
−40%
45−50
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and M3000M compete in popular games:

  • M3000M is 50% faster in 1080p
  • M3000M is 56% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 14% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the M3000M is 75% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • M3000M performs better in 16 tests (24%)
  • there's a draw in 49 tests (74%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.39 13.25
Recency 1 February 2018 18 August 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega M GL has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

M3000M, on the other hand, has a 41.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro M3000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M3000M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Quadro M3000M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
M3000M Quadro M3000M
vs
P2000 Max-Q Quadro P2000 Max-Q
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
RX Vega M GH AMD RX Vega M GH
vs
CMP 90HX 90HX
RTX 2050 Max-Q 2050 Max-Q
vs
RX Vega M GH Vega M GH
RX Vega M GH AMD RX Vega M GH
vs
Radeon 740M 740M
RX Vega M GH AMD RX Vega M GH
vs
RTX 5880 Ada Generation 5880 Ada Generation
RX Vega M GH AMD RX Vega M GH
vs
B100
RTX 3060 3840SP 3060 3840SP
vs
RX Vega M GL Vega M GL
RX Vega M GL AMD RX Vega M GL
vs
B200 SXM 192 GB 192 GB
RX Vega M GL AMD RX Vega M GL
vs
B100
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
ATI X800 PRO AGP X800 PRO AGP
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
Pro V340 MxGPU V340 MxGPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 377 votes

Rate Quadro M3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Quadro M3000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.