Quadro M5000M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M3000M Quadro M4000M Quadro M5000M Quadro M5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro M5000M, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
10.12

M5000M outperforms RX Vega M GL by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
M5000M M5000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking447307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7412.54
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 22GM204
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)18 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801,536
Core clock speed931 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1051 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8893.60
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS2.995 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs8096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 10.12
M5000M 18.19
+79.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3891
M5000M 6991
+79.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−91.1%
86
+91.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−79.5%
140−150
+79.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%
Fortnite 55−60
−66.1%
95−100
+66.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−60.3%
120−130
+60.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−86.7%
55−60
+86.7%
World of Tanks 140−150
−51%
210−220
+51%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−80.6%
65−70
+80.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−60.3%
120−130
+60.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−55%
30−35
+55%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−55%
30−35
+55%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 20−22
−55%
30−35
+55%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and M5000M compete in popular games:

  • M5000M is 91% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the M5000M is 87% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • M5000M is ahead in 11 tests (17%)
  • there's a draw in 53 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.12 18.19
Recency 1 February 2018 18 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

RX Vega M GL has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 53.8% lower power consumption.

M5000M, on the other hand, has a 79.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro M5000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M5000M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
M5000M Quadro M5000M
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
RX Vega M GH RX 5700 XT
vs
RX 5700 XT RX Vega M GH
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 950 GeForce GTX 950
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1630 GTX 1630
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
R5 (Bristol Ridge) Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 139 votes

Rate Quadro M5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.