Quadro M2000M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540X 630 E9173 PCIe RX 540 RX 550 Mobile RX 560 Mobile RX 560X Mobile RX 580 Mobile RX 640 RX Vega M GH RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K2200M M600M M620 M1000M M1200 M2000M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro M2000M, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.47
+16.1%

M GL outperforms M2000M by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
M2000M M2000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking512567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.2511.45
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code namePolaris 22GM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)3 December 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280640
Core clock speed931 MHz1029 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1098 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8843.92
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS1.405 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8040
L1 Cache320 KB320 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 9.47
+16.1%
M2000M 8.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3936
+16.1%
Samples: 335
M2000M 3391
Samples: 1640

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+11.1%
36
−11.1%
4K12−14
+9.1%
11
−9.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Fortnite 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+12.5%
120−130
−12.5%
Dota 2 65−70
+11.3%
60−65
−11.3%
Fortnite 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+16.7%
30
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+8.7%
23
−8.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 65−70
+11.3%
60−65
−11.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+78.6%
14
−78.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+22.2%
9
−22.2%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and M2000M compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is 11% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GL is 9% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 79% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL performs better in 17 tests (27%)
  • there's a draw in 46 tests (73%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.47 8.16
Recency 1 February 2018 3 December 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 16% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

M2000M, on the other hand, has 18% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RX 560X Radeon RX 560X
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Mobile
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
Playstation 5 Pro GPU Playstation 5 Pro GPU
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
M3000M Quadro M3000M
RX 460 RX 460
vs
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
RX 7700S RX 7700S
vs
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 3050 6GB Mobile
RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
vs
RTX 3050 6 GB 3050 6 GB
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 574 votes

Rate Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Quadro M2000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.