UHD Graphics vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GH and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega M GH
2018
4 GB HBM2, 100 Watt
17.09
+206%

RX Vega M GH outperforms UHD Graphics by a whopping 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking320606
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Power efficiency11.7938.57
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 22Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536256
Core clock speed1063 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate114.212.00
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs9616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width1024 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GH 17.09
+206%
UHD Graphics 5.59

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GH 6572
+206%
UHD Graphics 2151

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+222%
18−20
−222%
1440p44
+214%
14−16
−214%
4K30
+233%
9−10
−233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+225%
12−14
−225%
Elden Ring 50−55
+231%
16−18
−231%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+231%
16−18
−231%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 85
+215%
27−30
−215%
Metro Exodus 55
+244%
16−18
−244%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+225%
12−14
−225%
Valorant 65−70
+229%
21−24
−229%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+244%
16−18
−244%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+300%
3−4
−300%
Dota 2 76
+217%
24−27
−217%
Elden Ring 50−55
+231%
16−18
−231%
Far Cry 5 46
+229%
14−16
−229%
Fortnite 90−95
+210%
30−33
−210%
Forza Horizon 4 68
+224%
21−24
−224%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+233%
18−20
−233%
Metro Exodus 38
+217%
12−14
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71
+238%
21−24
−238%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+242%
12−14
−242%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+231%
16−18
−231%
Valorant 41
+242%
12−14
−242%
World of Tanks 210−220
+225%
65−70
−225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+242%
12−14
−242%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+300%
3−4
−300%
Dota 2 95
+217%
30−33
−217%
Far Cry 5 63
+250%
18−20
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+217%
18−20
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 47
+236%
14−16
−236%
Valorant 65−70
+229%
21−24
−229%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Elden Ring 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+218%
50−55
−218%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
World of Tanks 110−120
+237%
35−40
−237%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2 0−1
Far Cry 5 42
+250%
12−14
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+217%
12−14
−217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Valorant 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Dota 2 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Elden Ring 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Metro Exodus 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 49
+206%
16−18
−206%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Far Cry 5 21
+250%
6−7
−250%
Fortnite 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Valorant 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%

This is how RX Vega M GH and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GH is 222% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GH is 214% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M GH is 233% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.09 5.59
Recency 1 February 2018 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 10 Watt

RX Vega M GH has a 205.7% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6712 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.