UHD Graphics vs Radeon 630

Place in the ranking	704	608
Place by popularity	not in top-100	5
Power efficiency	5.40	38.50
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 23	Jasper Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)	11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	256
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	750 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	38.98	12.00
Floating-point processing power	1.247 TFLOPS	0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	32	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 630 3.93

UHD Graphics 5.60
+42.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 630 1512

UHD Graphics 2151
+42.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Elden Ring	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Valorant	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Dota 2	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Elden Ring	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −35%	27−30 +35%
Fortnite	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Valorant	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
World of Tanks	65−70 −41.8%	95−100 +41.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Dota 2	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −35%	27−30 +35%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%
Valorant	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Elden Ring	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −29.6%	35−40 +29.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
World of Tanks	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Valorant	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Elden Ring	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Fortnite	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Valorant	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.93	5.60
Recency	13 May 2019	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 42.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.