GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.00

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 208% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking488203
Place by popularity2821
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.13
Power efficiency41.4027.33
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVegaGA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122304
Core clock speedno data1042 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data105.8
Floating-point processing powerno data6.774 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data72
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−204%
70−75
+204%
1440p17
−194%
50−55
+194%
4K9
−200%
27−30
+200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.56
1440pno data3.58
4Kno data6.63

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
−208%
40−45
+208%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−189%
55−60
+189%
Elden Ring 18
−206%
55−60
+206%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−200%
27−30
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−200%
45−50
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 32
−197%
95−100
+197%
Metro Exodus 27
−196%
80−85
+196%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−203%
100−105
+203%
Valorant 44
−195%
130−140
+195%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−200%
27−30
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−173%
30−33
+173%
Dota 2 29
−193%
85−90
+193%
Elden Ring 22
−195%
65−70
+195%
Far Cry 5 30
−200%
90−95
+200%
Fortnite 50−55
−202%
160−170
+202%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−196%
80−85
+196%
Grand Theft Auto V 19
−189%
55−60
+189%
Metro Exodus 19
−189%
55−60
+189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 57
−198%
170−180
+198%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12
−192%
35−40
+192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Valorant 14
−186%
40−45
+186%
World of Tanks 48
−192%
140−150
+192%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−200%
27−30
+200%
Dota 2 48
−192%
140−150
+192%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−189%
110−120
+189%
Forza Horizon 4 23
−204%
70−75
+204%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−196%
210−220
+196%
Valorant 37
−197%
110−120
+197%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 9
−200%
27−30
+200%
Elden Ring 12
−192%
35−40
+192%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−200%
27−30
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
−195%
65−70
+195%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
World of Tanks 21
−186%
60−65
+186%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−181%
45−50
+181%
Metro Exodus 17
−194%
50−55
+194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Valorant 39
−208%
120−130
+208%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Dota 2 10
−200%
30−33
+200%
Elden Ring 6
−200%
18−20
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−200%
30−33
+200%
Metro Exodus 6
−200%
18−20
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 13
−208%
40−45
+208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−200%
30−33
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 18
−206%
55−60
+206%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Fortnite 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−200%
27−30
+200%
Valorant 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 204% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 194% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.00 27.73
Recency 7 January 2020 2 February 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6 GB, on the other hand, has a 208.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1249 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1410 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.