Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Place in the ranking	660	287
Place by popularity	38	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.61	74.19
Architecture	Vega (2017−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	26 October 2017 (7 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1024
Core clock speed	300 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	9,800 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	57.60	91.20
Floating-point processing power	1.843 TFLOPS	2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	32	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 4.51

T1200 Mobile 19.48
+332%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3557

T1200 Mobile 14387
+304%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 10294

T1200 Mobile 44135
+329%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2381

T1200 Mobile 10134
+326%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 15770

T1200 Mobile 50827
+222%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18 −222%	58 +222%
1440p	7−8 −371%	33 +371%
4K	8 −913%	81 +913%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−256%

30−35
+256%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	15 −193%	40−45 +193%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10 −370%	47 +370%
Battlefield 5	18 −261%	65−70 +261%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10 −300%	40−45 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 −256%	30−35 +256%
Far Cry 5	18 −261%	65 +261%
Far Cry New Dawn	18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Forza Horizon 4	58 −112%	120−130 +112%
Hitman 3	9 −333%	35−40 +333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −100%	60 +100%
Metro Exodus	22 −332%	95−100 +332%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16 −231%	50−55 +231%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19 −211%	59 +211%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65 +20.4%	54 −20.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30 −46.7%	40−45 +46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −600%	28 +600%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10 −300%	40−45 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 −433%	30−35 +433%
Far Cry 5	10 −490%	59 +490%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 −308%	50−55 +308%
Forza Horizon 4	52 −137%	120−130 +137%
Hitman 3	10−11 −290%	35−40 +290%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −56.7%	47 +56.7%
Metro Exodus	17 −306%	65−70 +306%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10 −430%	50−55 +430%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 −175%	44 +175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	31 −129%	71 +129%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55 +17%	47 −17%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8 −450%	40−45 +450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −425%	21 +425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7 −329%	30−33 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 −540%	30−35 +540%
Far Cry 5	7 −700%	56 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	23 −435%	120−130 +435%
Hitman 3	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	15 −300%	60−65 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14 −329%	60−65 +329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 −363%	37 +363%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +137%	19 −137%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−300%

40−45
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −720%	41 +720%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1288%	110−120 +1288%
Hitman 3	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +133%	12 −133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−275%

30−33

+275%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Hitman 3	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −3333%	100−110 +3333%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	20−22

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4 −200%	12−14 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	4−5
Far Cry 5	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Forza Horizon 4	9 −200%	27−30 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−320%

21−24

+320%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Hitman 3	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 +0%	32 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 +0%	18 +0%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

T1200 Mobile is 222% faster in 1080p
T1200 Mobile is 371% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 913% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 137% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 3333% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
T1200 Mobile is ahead in 45 tests (68%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.51	19.48
Recency	26 October 2017	12 April 2021
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	18 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has 20% lower power consumption.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 331.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.