GeForce GTX 285 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Aggregate performance score

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2017
15 Watt
4.50
+14.8%

Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms GeForce GTX 285 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking621662
Place by popularity42not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.64
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeGT200B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)23 December 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$359
Current priceno data$98 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512240
CUDA coresno data240
Core clock speedno data648 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt204 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data51.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performanceno data708.5 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and GeForce GTX 285 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1242 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data159.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataHDTVTwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)no data128bit

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDAno data+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
4K11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Battlefield 5 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Hitman 3 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+20%
10−11
−20%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10
+25%
8−9
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and GTX 285 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 19% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 22% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.50 3.92
Recency 26 October 2017 23 December 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 204 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 285 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
GeForce GTX 285

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1212 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 108 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.