GeForce 9500 GT vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 617 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 37 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | G96 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 26 October 2017 (6 years ago) | 29 July 2008 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $85.99 |
| Current price | no data | $153 (1.8x MSRP) |
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 32 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 32 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 550 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 314 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 8.8 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 89.6 gflops |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and GeForce 9500 GT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 6.875" (17.5 cm) |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
| SLI options | no data | + |
| Memory type | no data | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | S/PDIF |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | no data | N/A |
| CUDA | no data | + |
Pros & Cons Summary
| Recency | 26 October 2017 | 29 July 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and GeForce 9500 GT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook card while GeForce 9500 GT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
