Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RX Vega 7

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX Vega 7
2020
7.43

RX 6750 XT outperforms RX Vega 7 by 622% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking49838
Place by popularity11not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation10.9429.40
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549
Current price$387 $559 (1x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 169% better value for money than RX Vega 7.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482560
Core clock speedno data2150 MHz
Boost clock speed1800 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data416.0

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 7 and Radeon RX 6750 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data18000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 7 7.43
RX 6750 XT 53.66
+622%

RX 6750 XT outperforms RX Vega 7 by 622% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 7 17714
RX 6750 XT 104004
+487%

RX 6750 XT outperforms RX Vega 7 by 487% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 7 5249
RX 6750 XT 48327
+821%

RX 6750 XT outperforms RX Vega 7 by 821% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 7 3348
RX 6750 XT 37609
+1023%

RX 6750 XT outperforms RX Vega 7 by 1023% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 7 24726
RX 6750 XT 170993
+592%

RX 6750 XT outperforms RX Vega 7 by 592% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX Vega 7 194758
RX 6750 XT 529598
+172%

RX 6750 XT outperforms RX Vega 7 by 172% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−622%
166
+622%
1440p32
−191%
93
+191%
4K18
−194%
53
+194%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18
−817%
165
+817%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
−314%
85−90
+314%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
−389%
90−95
+389%
Battlefield 5 28
−393%
130−140
+393%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 23
−530%
140−150
+530%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−807%
127
+807%
Far Cry 5 20
−790%
178
+790%
Far Cry New Dawn 21
−614%
150
+614%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−316%
150−160
+316%
Hitman 3 21
−714%
170−180
+714%
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
−409%
110−120
+409%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
−480%
85−90
+480%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−1072%
211
+1072%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
−694%
135
+694%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
−412%
85−90
+412%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
−520%
90−95
+520%
Battlefield 5 23
−500%
130−140
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−706%
140−150
+706%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−990%
109
+990%
Far Cry 5 18
−844%
170
+844%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
−625%
145
+625%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−340%
150−160
+340%
Hitman 3 17
−906%
170−180
+906%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
−485%
110−120
+485%
Metro Exodus 13
−877%
127
+877%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−569%
85−90
+569%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
−1133%
185
+1133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−1189%
245
+1189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 15
−733%
125
+733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−480%
85−90
+480%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−830%
90−95
+830%
Battlefield 5 21
−557%
130−140
+557%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−989%
98
+989%
Far Cry 5 18
−778%
158
+778%
Far Cry New Dawn 18
−622%
130
+622%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−470%
150−160
+470%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−938%
135
+938%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−717%
98
+717%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−755%
90−95
+755%
Hitman 3 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−531%
80−85
+531%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1167%
76
+1167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1080%
118
+1080%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−883%
55−60
+883%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−3050%
60−65
+3050%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−1067%
100−110
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1900%
60
+1900%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1075%
141
+1075%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−1160%
126
+1160%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−883%
110−120
+883%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1171%
85−90
+1171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−3550%
73
+3550%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Hitman 3 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−1900%
60
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1875%
79
+1875%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1167%
35−40
+1167%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1200%
78
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−811%
82
+811%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1950%
41
+1950%

This is how RX Vega 7 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 622% faster than RX Vega 7 in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 191% faster than RX Vega 7 in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 194% faster than RX Vega 7 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 4600% faster than the RX Vega 7.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6750 XT surpassed RX Vega 7 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 7.43 53.66
Recency 7 January 2020 3 March 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 7 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Radeon RX Vega 7
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4365 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2055 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.