Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs RX Vega 64

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 64 with Radeon PRO WX 2100, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 64
2017
8 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
35.62
+669%

RX Vega 64 outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 669% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking130646
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.393.79
Power efficiency8.649.47
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Lexa
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 August 2017 (7 years ago)4 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 64 has 464% better value for money than PRO WX 2100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096512
Core clock speed1247 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate395.839.01
Floating-point processing power12.66 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs25632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length279 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 64 35.62
+669%
PRO WX 2100 4.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 64 14233
+669%
PRO WX 2100 1850

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+743%
14−16
−743%
1440p80
+700%
10−12
−700%
4K52
+767%
6−7
−767%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.23
+152%
10.64
−152%
1440p6.24
+139%
14.90
−139%
4K9.60
+159%
24.83
−159%
  • RX Vega 64 has 152% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 has 139% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 has 159% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+485%
12−14
−485%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+690%
10−11
−690%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 82
+486%
14−16
−486%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+485%
12−14
−485%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+240%
10−11
−240%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+910%
20−22
−910%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+956%
9−10
−956%
Metro Exodus 105
+855%
10−12
−855%
Red Dead Redemption 2 116
+673%
14−16
−673%
Valorant 182
+1300%
12−14
−1300%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 174
+1143%
14−16
−1143%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+485%
12−14
−485%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+170%
10−11
−170%
Dota 2 50
+213%
16−18
−213%
Far Cry 5 62
+158%
24−27
−158%
Fortnite 123
+339%
27−30
−339%
Forza Horizon 4 164
+720%
20−22
−720%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+956%
9−10
−956%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+631%
16−18
−631%
Metro Exodus 79
+618%
10−12
−618%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+378%
40−45
−378%
Red Dead Redemption 2 57
+280%
14−16
−280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+713%
16−18
−713%
Valorant 92
+608%
12−14
−608%
World of Tanks 270−280
+253%
75−80
−253%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+414%
14−16
−414%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+485%
12−14
−485%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+140%
10−11
−140%
Dota 2 138
+763%
16−18
−763%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%
Forza Horizon 4 143
+615%
20−22
−615%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+956%
9−10
−956%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+378%
40−45
−378%
Valorant 140
+977%
12−14
−977%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+1600%
4−5
−1600%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+1260%
5−6
−1260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+447%
30−35
−447%
Red Dead Redemption 2 37
+825%
4−5
−825%
World of Tanks 230−240
+594%
30−35
−594%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+200%
5−6
−200%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+1090%
10−11
−1090%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+1329%
7−8
−1329%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+917%
6−7
−917%
Metro Exodus 79
+2533%
3−4
−2533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+688%
8−9
−688%
Valorant 95
+631%
12−14
−631%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Dota 2 70−75
+318%
16−18
−318%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+344%
16−18
−344%
Metro Exodus 46 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+750%
14−16
−750%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+344%
16−18
−344%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+1075%
4−5
−1075%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Dota 2 96
+465%
16−18
−465%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+980%
5−6
−980%
Fortnite 50
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+1375%
4−5
−1375%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Valorant 49
+1125%
4−5
−1125%

This is how RX Vega 64 and PRO WX 2100 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 64 is 743% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 is 700% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 is 767% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 64 is 2533% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX Vega 64 surpassed PRO WX 2100 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.62 4.63
Recency 7 August 2017 4 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 64 has a 669.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO WX 2100, on the other hand, has 742.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 732 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.