GeForce GTX TITAN vs Radeon RX Vega 64

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX TITAN, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 64
2017
8 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
36.72
+73%

RX Vega 64 outperforms GTX TITAN by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking133267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.793.30
Power efficiency8.595.86
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameVega 10GK110
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 August 2017 (7 years ago)19 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX Vega 64 has 560% better value for money than GTX TITAN.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962688
Core clock speed1247 MHz837 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHz876 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate395.8196.2
Floating-point processing power12.66 TFLOPS4.709 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs256224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mm267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed945 MHz6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s288.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI++
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
3D Vision Live-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 64 36.72
+73%
GTX TITAN 21.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 64 14197
+73%
GTX TITAN 8205

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 64 22501
+115%
GTX TITAN 10470

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
+83.1%
65−70
−83.1%
1440p82
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
4K54
+80%
30−35
−80%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.19
+267%
15.37
−267%
1440p6.09
+265%
22.20
−265%
4K9.24
+260%
33.30
−260%
  • RX Vega 64 has 267% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 has 265% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 has 260% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+73.3%
45−50
−73.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%
Battlefield 5 161
+78.9%
90−95
−78.9%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+73.3%
45−50
−73.3%
Far Cry 5 110
+83.3%
60−65
−83.3%
Fortnite 150−160
+78.8%
85−90
−78.8%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+75.8%
95−100
−75.8%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+81.8%
55−60
−81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+82.7%
75−80
−82.7%
Valorant 315
+75%
180−190
−75%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+83.6%
55−60
−83.6%
Battlefield 5 146
+82.5%
80−85
−82.5%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+73.1%
160−170
−73.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+73.3%
45−50
−73.3%
Dota 2 150
+76.5%
85−90
−76.5%
Far Cry 5 104
+73.3%
60−65
−73.3%
Fortnite 150−160
+78.8%
85−90
−78.8%
Forza Horizon 4 158
+75.6%
90−95
−75.6%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+81.8%
55−60
−81.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+80%
65−70
−80%
Metro Exodus 73
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+82.7%
75−80
−82.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+76%
75−80
−76%
Valorant 293
+83.1%
160−170
−83.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 139
+73.8%
80−85
−73.8%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+73.3%
45−50
−73.3%
Dota 2 138
+84%
75−80
−84%
Far Cry 5 98
+78.2%
55−60
−78.2%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+82.9%
70−75
−82.9%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+81.8%
55−60
−81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+82.7%
75−80
−82.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+92.5%
40−45
−92.5%
Valorant 140
+75%
80−85
−75%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+78.8%
85−90
−78.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+80.8%
130−140
−80.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+94.3%
35−40
−94.3%
Metro Exodus 46
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
Valorant 263
+75.3%
150−160
−75.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+80%
50−55
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Far Cry 5 81
+80%
45−50
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+78.2%
55−60
−78.2%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+76%
50−55
−76%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Metro Exodus 46
+91.7%
24−27
−91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Valorant 205
+86.4%
110−120
−86.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+96.7%
30−33
−96.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Dota 2 96
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
Far Cry 5 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+88.6%
35−40
−88.6%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%

This is how RX Vega 64 and GTX TITAN compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 64 is 83% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 is 82% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 is 80% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.72 21.22
Recency 7 August 2017 19 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 250 Watt

RX Vega 64 has a 73% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX TITAN, on the other hand, has 18% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX TITAN in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GeForce GTX TITAN

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 740 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 164 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 or GeForce GTX TITAN, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.