Radeon 620 vs RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated852
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameVega 10Polaris 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 August 2017 (7 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096384
Core clock speed1406 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed1677 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate429.324.58
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs25624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 50 Watt

RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Radeon 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 350% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition and Radeon 620. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition is a desktop card while Radeon 620 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.