Radeon RX 7900M vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon RX 7900M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
6.07

RX 7900M outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 890% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking58633
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.9223.04
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega RenoirNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844608
Core clock speed400 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rateno data601.9
Floating-point processing powerno data38.52 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 6.07
RX 7900M 60.11
+890%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 4210
RX 7900M 59943
+1324%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 2793
RX 7900M 50241
+1699%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 852
RX 7900M 19434
+2181%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−690%
158
+690%
1440p22
−427%
116
+427%
4K17
−441%
92
+441%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−809%
100−105
+809%
Elden Ring 16−18
−1313%
220−230
+1313%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−516%
110−120
+516%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−844%
85−90
+844%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−1150%
300−350
+1150%
Metro Exodus 14
−807%
120−130
+807%
Red Dead Redemption 2 22
−395%
100−110
+395%
Valorant 25
−988%
270−280
+988%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−516%
110−120
+516%
Counter-Strike 2 8
−1538%
131
+1538%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
−800%
27−30
+800%
Dota 2 24
−479%
139
+479%
Elden Ring 8
−2725%
220−230
+2725%
Far Cry 5 26
−223%
84
+223%
Fortnite 35−40
−556%
230−240
+556%
Forza Horizon 4 21
−1448%
300−350
+1448%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−827%
139
+827%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−747%
120−130
+747%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
−451%
210−220
+451%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−506%
100−110
+506%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−816%
170−180
+816%
Valorant 12
−2167%
270−280
+2167%
World of Tanks 56
−398%
270−280
+398%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−516%
110−120
+516%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−829%
130
+829%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Dota 2 40
−775%
350−400
+775%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−325%
110−120
+325%
Forza Horizon 4 18
−1811%
344
+1811%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−330%
210−220
+330%
Valorant 19
−1332%
270−280
+1332%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
−1667%
106
+1667%
Elden Ring 7−8
−2000%
140−150
+2000%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−1667%
106
+1667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−373%
170−180
+373%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
World of Tanks 40−45
−802%
350−400
+802%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−770%
85−90
+770%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−844%
85
+844%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1131%
160−170
+1131%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2390%
249
+2390%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1557%
110−120
+1557%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1686%
120−130
+1686%
Valorant 16−18
−1375%
230−240
+1375%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−759%
146
+759%
Elden Ring 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−759%
146
+759%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1129%
200−210
+1129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−759%
146
+759%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1440%
75−80
+1440%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Dota 2 19
−847%
180−190
+847%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1400%
100−110
+1400%
Fortnite 5−6
−1820%
95−100
+1820%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2083%
131
+2083%
Valorant 6−7
−2117%
130−140
+2117%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 690% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 427% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 441% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7900M is 2750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is ahead in 53 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.07 60.11
Recency 7 January 2020 19 October 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 180 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has 1100% lower power consumption.

RX 7900M, on the other hand, has a 890.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 704 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 62 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.