GeForce GTX 775M vs Radeon RX Vega 56

Place in the ranking	155	476
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	23.24	no data
Power efficiency	11.24	6.52
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Vega 10	N13E-GTX-A2
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	14 August 2017 (7 years ago)	24 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	1344
Core clock speed	1156 MHz	719 MHz
Boost clock speed	1471 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	12,500 million	3540 Million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	329.5	no data
Floating-point processing power	10.54 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	224	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	409.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.1.125	-
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 56 33.23
+262%

GTX 775M 9.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 56 13163
+262%

GTX 775M 3634

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 56 29086
+379%

GTX 775M 6071

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	115 +283%	30−35 −283%
1440p	74 +311%	18−21 −311%
4K	48 +300%	12−14 −300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.47	no data
1440p	5.39	no data
4K	8.31	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +331%	16−18 −331%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +279%	18−20 −279%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	88 +184%	30−35 −184%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +331%	16−18 −331%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +279%	18−20 −279%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +335%	35−40 −335%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +271%	24−27 −271%
Metro Exodus	96 +269%	24−27 −269%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +176%	24−27 −176%
Valorant	130−140 +278%	35−40 −278%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	156 +403%	30−35 −403%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +331%	16−18 −331%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +279%	18−20 −279%
Dota 2	63 +85.3%	30−35 −85.3%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +133%	35−40 −133%
Fortnite	140 +155%	55−60 −155%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +335%	35−40 −335%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +271%	24−27 −271%
Grand Theft Auto V	94 +185%	30−35 −185%
Metro Exodus	73 +181%	24−27 −181%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +155%	70−75 −155%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +176%	24−27 −176%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +307%	27−30 −307%
Valorant	130−140 +278%	35−40 −278%
World of Tanks	270−280 +101%	130−140 −101%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +158%	30−35 −158%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +331%	16−18 −331%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +279%	18−20 −279%
Dota 2	110−120 +226%	30−35 −226%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +133%	35−40 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +335%	35−40 −335%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 +271%	24−27 −271%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	112 +51.4%	70−75 −51.4%
Valorant	130−140 +278%	35−40 −278%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Dota 2	60−65 +417%	12−14 −417%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 +417%	12−14 −417%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +289%	45−50 −289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +313%	8−9 −313%
World of Tanks	210−220 +222%	65−70 −222%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	67 +272%	18−20 −272%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +371%	7−8 −371%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +445%	20−22 −445%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +357%	21−24 −357%
Forza Horizon 5	55−60 +300%	14−16 −300%
Metro Exodus	74 +335%	16−18 −335%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +338%	12−14 −338%
Valorant	100−110 +325%	24−27 −325%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Dota 2	50 +150%	20−22 −150%
Grand Theft Auto V	50 +150%	20−22 −150%
Metro Exodus	27 +575%	4−5 −575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +300%	27−30 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 +150%	20−22 −150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35 +338%	8−9 −338%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Dota 2	60−65 +220%	20−22 −220%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +345%	10−12 −345%
Fortnite	45−50 +360%	10−11 −360%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +358%	12−14 −358%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +343%	7−8 −343%
Valorant	50−55 +478%	9−10 −478%

This is how RX Vega 56 and GTX 775M compete in popular games:

RX Vega 56 is 283% faster in 1080p
RX Vega 56 is 311% faster in 1440p
RX Vega 56 is 300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 56 is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX Vega 56 surpassed GTX 775M in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.23	9.18
Recency	14 August 2017	24 September 2013
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	100 Watt

RX Vega 56 has a 262% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 775M, on the other hand, has 110% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 775M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.