GeForce 9600 GT vs Radeon RX Vega 56

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce 9600 GT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2, 210 Watt
34.33
+2625%

RX Vega 56 outperforms 9600 GT by a whopping 2625% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking140999
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.600.03
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVegaG94
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 August 2017 (6 years ago)21 February 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $179
Current price$224 (0.6x MSRP)$141 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 56 has 88567% better value for money than 9600 GT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358464
CUDA coresno data64
Core clock speed1138 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1474 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt96 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate329.520.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance10,566 gflops208 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm9" (22.9 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin6-pin
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width409.6 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s57.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortHDTVTwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 56 34.33
+2625%
9600 GT 1.26

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce 9600 GT by 2625% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 56 13258
+2622%
9600 GT 487

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms GeForce 9600 GT by 2622% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115
+2775%
4−5
−2775%
1440p70
+3400%
2−3
−3400%
4K51
+5000%
1−2
−5000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1600−1650
+2612%
55−60
−2612%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2050−2100
+2562%
77
−2562%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1600−1650
+2612%
55−60
−2612%
Battlefield 5 4450−4500
+2613%
164
−2613%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1900−1950
+2614%
70−75
−2614%
Cyberpunk 2077 1600−1650
+2612%
55−60
−2612%
Far Cry 5 3100−3150
+2596%
115
−2596%
Far Cry New Dawn 3100−3150
+2619%
114
−2619%
Forza Horizon 4 3800−3850
+2595%
141
−2595%
Hitman 3 1900−1950
+2576%
70−75
−2576%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3750−3800
+2617%
130−140
−2617%
Metro Exodus 3900−3950
+2608%
144
−2608%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2300−2350
+2574%
85−90
−2574%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3500−3550
+2613%
120−130
−2613%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2400−2450
+2597%
85−90
−2597%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1900−1950
+2614%
70
−2614%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1600−1650
+2612%
55−60
−2612%
Battlefield 5 4150−4200
+2612%
153
−2612%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1900−1950
+2614%
70−75
−2614%
Cyberpunk 2077 1600−1650
+2612%
55−60
−2612%
Far Cry 5 2500−2550
+2617%
92
−2617%
Far Cry New Dawn 2350−2400
+2570%
88
−2570%
Forza Horizon 4 7400−7450
+2621%
272
−2621%
Hitman 3 1900−1950
+2576%
70−75
−2576%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3750−3800
+2617%
130−140
−2617%
Metro Exodus 2850−2900
+2589%
106
−2589%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2300−2350
+2574%
85−90
−2574%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3500−3550
+2613%
120−130
−2613%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3350−3400
+2602%
124
−2602%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2400−2450
+2597%
85−90
−2597%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1400−1450
+2592%
52
−2592%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1600−1650
+2612%
55−60
−2612%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1900−1950
+2614%
70−75
−2614%
Cyberpunk 2077 1600−1650
+2612%
55−60
−2612%
Far Cry 5 1850−1900
+2581%
69
−2581%
Forza Horizon 4 2950−3000
+2606%
109
−2606%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3750−3800
+2617%
130−140
−2617%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3500−3550
+2613%
120−130
−2613%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2000−2050
+2603%
74
−2603%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2400−2450
+2597%
85−90
−2597%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2300−2350
+2574%
85−90
−2574%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2650−2700
+2604%
98
−2604%
Far Cry New Dawn 2250−2300
+2579%
84
−2579%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1150−1200
+2514%
44
−2514%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1000−1050
+2603%
35−40
−2603%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1350−1400
+2547%
50−55
−2547%
Cyberpunk 2077 650−700
+2500%
24−27
−2500%
Far Cry 5 2000−2050
+2603%
74
−2603%
Forza Horizon 4 2350−2400
+2570%
88
−2570%
Hitman 3 1150−1200
+2574%
40−45
−2574%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1950−2000
+2571%
70−75
−2571%
Metro Exodus 2000−2050
+2603%
74
−2603%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2200−2250
+2616%
80−85
−2616%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1250−1300
+2560%
45−50
−2560%
Watch Dogs: Legion 750−800
+2486%
27−30
−2486%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1600−1650
+2612%
55−60
−2612%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1250−1300
+2617%
46
−2617%
Far Cry New Dawn 850−900
+2556%
32
−2556%
Hitman 3 750−800
+2579%
27−30
−2579%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1100−1150
+2519%
40−45
−2519%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 800−850
+2481%
31
−2481%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1150−1200
+2514%
44
−2514%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 700−750
+2493%
27
−2493%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 550−600
+2519%
21−24
−2519%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 550−600
+2519%
21−24
−2519%
Cyberpunk 2077 270−280
+2600%
10−11
−2600%
Far Cry 5 600−650
+2509%
23
−2509%
Forza Horizon 4 1600−1650
+2612%
59
−2612%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1100−1150
+2519%
40−45
−2519%
Metro Exodus 1100−1150
+2519%
42
−2519%
Watch Dogs: Legion 450−500
+2547%
16−18
−2547%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 800−850
+2567%
30−33
−2567%

This is how RX Vega 56 and 9600 GT compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 56 is 2775% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 56 is 3400% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 56 is 5000% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.33 1.26
Recency 14 August 2017 21 February 2008
Cost $399 $179
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 96 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9600 GT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 704 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1916 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.