UHD Graphics P630 vs Radeon RX Vega 5
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 and UHD Graphics P630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics P630 outperforms RX Vega 5 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 696 | 620 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 21.60 | 29.88 |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Vega | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 January 2020 (5 years ago) | 24 May 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 28.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.4608 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 3 |
| TMUs | no data | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 19
−26.3%
| 24−27
+26.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 43
+48.3%
|
27−30
−48.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| God of War | 11
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 22
−18.2%
|
24−27
+18.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 29
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 15
−26.7%
|
18−20
+26.7%
|
| Fortnite | 52
+44.4%
|
35−40
−44.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
−35%
|
27−30
+35%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 17
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| God of War | 10−11
−30%
|
12−14
+30%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−29.4%
|
21−24
+29.4%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
−21.4%
|
65−70
+21.4%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18
−44.4%
|
24−27
+44.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7
−314%
|
27−30
+314%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50
−98%
|
95−100
+98%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 39
−25.6%
|
45−50
+25.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12
−58.3%
|
18−20
+58.3%
|
| Fortnite | 21
−71.4%
|
35−40
+71.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
−35%
|
27−30
+35%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 15
−13.3%
|
16−18
+13.3%
|
| God of War | 10−11
−30%
|
12−14
+30%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 13
−61.5%
|
21−24
+61.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−29.4%
|
21−24
+29.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
−14.3%
|
16−18
+14.3%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
−21.4%
|
65−70
+21.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16
−62.5%
|
24−27
+62.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 37
−32.4%
|
45−50
+32.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−46.2%
|
18−20
+46.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
−35%
|
27−30
+35%
|
| God of War | 10−11
−30%
|
12−14
+30%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−29.4%
|
21−24
+29.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9
−77.8%
|
16−18
+77.8%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
−21.4%
|
65−70
+21.4%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 12
−200%
|
35−40
+200%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−37.5%
|
10−12
+37.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
−39.4%
|
45−50
+39.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−15.2%
|
35−40
+15.2%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−45.7%
|
65−70
+45.7%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−37.5%
|
10−12
+37.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
| God of War | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−6.3%
|
16−18
+6.3%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−42.9%
|
30−33
+42.9%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−50%
|
21−24
+50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| God of War | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
4K
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
This is how RX Vega 5 and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics P630 is 26% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX Vega 5 is 48% faster.
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 350% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 5 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
- UHD Graphics P630 is ahead in 56 tests (89%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.25 | 5.88 |
| Recency | 7 January 2020 | 24 May 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
RX Vega 5 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
UHD Graphics P630, on the other hand, has a 38.4% higher aggregate performance score.
The UHD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 5 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
