Radeon 820M vs RX Vega 5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 and Radeon 820M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.25
+229%

RX Vega 5 outperforms 820M by a whopping 229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7001052
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.60no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)RDNA 3+ (2024)
GPU code nameVegaKrackan Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)2 June 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320128
Boost clock speed1400 MHz2900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory clock speedno data7500 MHz
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+280%
5−6
−280%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 43
+258%
12−14
−258%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+263%
8−9
−263%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Far Cry 5 15
+400%
3−4
−400%
Fortnite 52
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Hogwarts Legacy 8
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Valorant 55−60
+67.6%
30−35
−67.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Dota 2 39
+290%
10−11
−290%
Far Cry 5 12
+300%
3−4
−300%
Fortnite 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 4
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+100%
7−8
−100%
Valorant 55−60
+67.6%
30−35
−67.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Dota 2 37
+270%
10−11
−270%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 55−60
+256%
16−18
−256%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12
+200%
4−5
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Valorant 45−50
+820%
5−6
−820%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how RX Vega 5 and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is 280% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 5 is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX Vega 5 surpassed Radeon 820M in all 45 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.25 1.29
Recency 7 January 2020 2 June 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm

RX Vega 5 has a 229.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
AMD Radeon 820M
Radeon 820M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 231 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or Radeon 820M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.