Radeon 820M vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon 820M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms 820M by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 545 | 673 |
| Place by popularity | 25 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 41.82 | no data |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | RDNA 3+ (2024) |
| GPU code name | Vega | Krackan Point |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 January 2020 (5 years ago) | 2 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 128 |
| Boost clock speed | 2100 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory clock speed | no data | 7500 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 22
+83.3%
| 12−14
−83.3%
|
| 1440p | 16
+77.8%
| 9−10
−77.8%
|
| 4K | 10
+100%
| 5−6
−100%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 63
+186%
|
21−24
−186%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 39
+95%
|
20−22
−95%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 43
+95.5%
|
21−24
−95.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 13
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21
+40%
|
14−16
−40%
|
| Fortnite | 47
+62.1%
|
27−30
−62.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+60.9%
|
21−24
−60.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 33
+136%
|
14−16
−136%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14
+40%
|
10−11
−40%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
+57.9%
|
18−20
−57.9%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+37.7%
|
60−65
−37.7%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 33
+65%
|
20−22
−65%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 19
−15.8%
|
21−24
+15.8%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 48
−75%
|
80−85
+75%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 51
+70%
|
30−33
−70%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| Fortnite | 31
+6.9%
|
27−30
−6.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+60.9%
|
21−24
−60.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 28
+100%
|
14−16
−100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16
+77.8%
|
9−10
−77.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
+57.9%
|
18−20
−57.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21
+50%
|
14−16
−50%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+37.7%
|
60−65
−37.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 30
+50%
|
20−22
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 48
+77.8%
|
27−30
−77.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 19
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+60.9%
|
21−24
−60.9%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
+57.9%
|
18−20
−57.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 37
+76.2%
|
21−24
−76.2%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 18
−61.1%
|
27−30
+61.1%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+66.7%
|
9−10
−66.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21
−81%
|
35−40
+81%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 22
+83.3%
|
12−14
−83.3%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+72.2%
|
50−55
−72.2%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21
+320%
|
5−6
−320%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16
+77.8%
|
9−10
−77.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+66.7%
|
12−14
−66.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+71.4%
|
7−8
−71.4%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 16−18
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10
−70%
|
16−18
+70%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+72%
|
24−27
−72%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Dota 2 | 18
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+100%
|
7−8
−100%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 83% faster in 1080p
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 78% faster in 1440p
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 100% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 700% faster.
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 820M is 81% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) performs better in 47 tests (84%)
- Radeon 820M performs better in 7 tests (13%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.75 | 4.59 |
| Recency | 7 January 2020 | 2 June 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 68.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
