Quadro P620 vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 3 with Quadro P620, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 3
2019
15 Watt
2.99

P620 outperforms RX Vega 3 by a whopping 218% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking783468
Place by popularity85not in top-100
Power efficiency13.7216.35
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePicassoGP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed300 MHz1177 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHz1443 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0146.18
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96.13 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 3 2.99
Quadro P620 9.50
+218%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 3 1149
Quadro P620 3652
+218%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 3 1724
Quadro P620 5909
+243%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 3 5441
Quadro P620 25105
+361%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 3 1172
Quadro P620 4673
+299%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 3 8536
Quadro P620 30410
+256%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 3 80755
Quadro P620 310112
+284%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega 3 393
Quadro P620 1388
+253%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−300%
48
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Elden Ring 7
−286%
27−30
+286%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−171%
35−40
+171%
Metro Exodus 5
−420%
24−27
+420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6
−317%
24−27
+317%
Valorant 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Dota 2 13
−131%
30
+131%
Elden Ring 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 12
−433%
64
+433%
Fortnite 16−18
−229%
55−60
+229%
Forza Horizon 4 11
−245%
35−40
+245%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−278%
30−35
+278%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−20%
6
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
−468%
125
+468%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−867%
27−30
+867%
Valorant 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
World of Tanks 23
−500%
130−140
+500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Dota 2 19
−337%
83
+337%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−129%
35−40
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−322%
35−40
+322%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−174%
70−75
+174%
Valorant 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Elden Ring 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−119%
45−50
+119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
World of Tanks 21−24
−224%
65−70
+224%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Valorant 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Elden Ring 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 10−12
Valorant 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how RX Vega 3 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is 300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P620 is 3400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is ahead in 58 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.99 9.50
Recency 6 January 2019 1 February 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 11 months, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

Quadro P620, on the other hand, has a 217.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2026 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 636 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.