GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh vs Radeon RX Vega 3

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking772not rated
Place by popularity80not in top-100
Power efficiency13.76no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePicassoTU116B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)15 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921536
Core clock speed300 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.01152.6
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs1296

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 15 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1951 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 44 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.