GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 3

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking741not rated
Place by popularity75not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.90no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeTU116B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)15 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229
Current price$371 $911 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921280
Core clock speed600 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.13127.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 3 and GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDAno data7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 15 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1855 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 93 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.