Quadro K2100M vs Radeon RX Vega 11

Place in the ranking	609	727
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.63
Power efficiency	10.82	4.43
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Raven	GK106
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	10 May 2018 (6 years ago)	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$84.95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	704	576
Core clock speed	300 MHz	667 MHz
Boost clock speed	1251 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,940 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.04	32.02
Floating-point processing power	1.761 TFLOPS	0.7684 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	44	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	IGP	MXM-A (3.0)
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	2 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	48.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Motherboard Dependent	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.7 (6.4)	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	+
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.49
+55.5%

K2100M 3.53

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2109
+55.5%

K2100M 1356

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 11 5483
+129%

K2100M 2394

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 11 3494
+118%

K2100M 1606

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 11 20848
+76.2%

K2100M 11835

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	28 +16.7%	24 −16.7%
1440p	5 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
4K	12 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.54
1440p	no data	28.32
4K	no data	12.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Elden Ring	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	20 +25%	16−18 −25%
Metro Exodus	18 +157%	7−8 −157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Valorant	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Dota 2	27 +170%	10−11 −170%
Elden Ring	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Far Cry 5	30 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Fortnite	30−35 +60%	20−22 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	17 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	17 +70%	10−11 −70%
Metro Exodus	11 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	54 +74.2%	30−35 −74.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Valorant	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
World of Tanks	85−90 +44.3%	60−65 −44.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Dota 2	42 +320%	10−11 −320%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +36.8%	18−20 −36.8%
Forza Horizon 4	15 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +48.4%	30−35 −48.4%
Valorant	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Elden Ring	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +40%	24−27 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
World of Tanks	35−40 +56%	24−27 −56%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Valorant	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Elden Ring	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	15 +50%	10−11 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	17 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Fortnite	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Valorant	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

This is how RX Vega 11 and K2100M compete in popular games:

RX Vega 11 is 17% faster in 1080p
RX Vega 11 is 67% faster in 1440p
RX Vega 11 is 71% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 11 is 400% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K2100M is 7% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX Vega 11 is ahead in 57 tests (97%)
K2100M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.49	3.53
Recency	10 May 2018	23 July 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	55 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 55.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.