GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 10 with GeForce GTX 460 768MB, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 10
2019
10 Watt
3.65

GTX 460 768MB outperforms RX Vega 10 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking694687
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.06no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRavenno data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640336
Core clock speed300 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate52.04no data
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1800 MHz
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 10 3.65
GTX 460 768MB 3.74
+2.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 10 3389
+20.6%
GTX 460 768MB 2811

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 10 11391
GTX 460 768MB 12262
+7.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 10 2272
+8.6%
GTX 460 768MB 2092

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 10 14835
GTX 460 768MB 17589
+18.6%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 10 113236
GTX 460 768MB 133103
+17.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−176%
47
+176%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 19
+90%
10−11
−90%
Counter-Strike 2 40
+150%
16−18
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+50%
8−9
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Battlefield 5 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+106%
16−18
−106%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 12
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Fortnite 33
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%
Forza Horizon 5 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 42
−71.4%
70−75
+71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 32
−12.5%
35−40
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 11
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 15
−53.3%
21−24
+53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Forza Horizon 5 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−50%
15
+50%
Metro Exodus 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 29
−24.1%
35−40
+24.1%
Far Cry 5 10
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
−2.4%
40−45
+2.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1

This is how RX Vega 10 and GTX 460 768MB compete in popular games:

  • GTX 460 768MB is 176% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX Vega 10 is 150% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 460 768MB is 78% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 10 is ahead in 12 tests (21%)
  • GTX 460 768MB is ahead in 24 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (38%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.65 3.74

GTX 460 768MB has a 2.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega 10 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 460 768MB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1081 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 99 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or GeForce GTX 460 768MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.