Arc A370M vs Radeon RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 10 and Arc A370M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 10
2019
10 Watt
3.68

A370M outperforms 10 by a whopping 214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking740436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.6626.64
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRavenDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate52.0499.20
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs4064
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 10 3.68
Arc A370M 11.57
+214%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 10 1629
Samples: 1169
Arc A370M 5115
+214%
Samples: 2

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 10 3389
Arc A370M 12090
+257%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 10 2272
Arc A370M 8149
+259%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 10 14835
Arc A370M 35604
+140%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega 10 737
Arc A370M 3885
+427%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−129%
39
+129%
1440p6−7
−233%
20
+233%
4K10−12
−240%
34
+240%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40
−72.5%
65−70
+72.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−283%
46
+283%
Hogwarts Legacy 14
−207%
43
+207%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 19
−184%
50−55
+184%
Counter-Strike 2 33
−109%
65−70
+109%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−311%
37
+311%
Far Cry 5 12
−308%
49
+308%
Fortnite 33
−118%
70−75
+118%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−212%
50−55
+212%
Forza Horizon 5 13
−192%
35−40
+192%
Hogwarts Legacy 9
−233%
30
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
−200%
45−50
+200%
Valorant 50−55
−102%
100−110
+102%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
−238%
50−55
+238%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−667%
65−70
+667%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 42
−319%
170−180
+319%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−400%
25
+400%
Dota 2 32
−113%
68
+113%
Far Cry 5 11
−318%
46
+318%
Fortnite 15
−380%
70−75
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−279%
50−55
+279%
Forza Horizon 5 11
−245%
35−40
+245%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−190%
29
+190%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−122%
20
+122%
Metro Exodus 6
−467%
34
+467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
−275%
45−50
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−342%
53
+342%
Valorant 50−55
−102%
100−110
+102%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 17
−218%
50−55
+218%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−163%
21
+163%
Dota 2 29
−128%
66
+128%
Far Cry 5 10
−330%
43
+330%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−179%
50−55
+179%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−44.4%
13
+44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−225%
26
+225%
Valorant 50−55
−102%
100−110
+102%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−213%
70−75
+213%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−210%
90−95
+210%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−267%
11
+267%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−900%
20
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−235%
100−110
+235%
Valorant 40−45
−222%
130−140
+222%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−314%
29
+314%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Valorant 20−22
−235%
65−70
+235%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 12−14
−208%
40
+208%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how RX Vega 10 and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A370M is 129% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A370M is 233% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A370M is 240% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A370M is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A370M performs better in 58 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.68 11.57
Recency 8 January 2019 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 10 has 250% lower power consumption.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has a 214.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A370M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 10 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1145 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 188 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.