Arc A370M vs Radeon RX Vega 10

Place in the ranking	678	383
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	29.40	26.33
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Raven	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	8 January 2019 (5 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1024
Core clock speed	300 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1301 MHz	1550 MHz
Number of transistors	4,940 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.04	99.20
Floating-point processing power	1.665 TFLOPS	3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	40	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 10 4.23

Arc A370M 13.26
+213%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 10 1633

Arc A370M 5115
+213%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 10 3389

Arc A370M 12090
+257%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 10 2272

Arc A370M 8149
+259%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 10 14835

Arc A370M 35604
+140%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega 10 737

Arc A370M 3885
+427%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	17 −129%	39 +129%
1440p	6−7 −250%	21 +250%
4K	10−12 −240%	34 +240%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−283%

46
+283%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9 −300%	35−40 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 −175%	33 +175%
Battlefield 5	17 −200%	50−55 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	15 −113%	30−35 +113%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 −311%	37 +311%
Far Cry 5	11 −236%	35−40 +236%
Far Cry New Dawn	18 −139%	40−45 +139%
Forza Horizon 4	45 −127%	100−110 +127%
Hitman 3	9 −233%	30−33 +233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −186%	80−85 +186%
Metro Exodus	21 −157%	50−55 +157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	19 −126%	40−45 +126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20 −155%	50−55 +155%
Watch Dogs: Legion	63 −27%	80−85 +27%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 −157%	35−40 +157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8 −150%	20 +150%
Battlefield 5	8 −538%	50−55 +538%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14 −129%	30−35 +129%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 −400%	25 +400%
Far Cry 5	9 −311%	35−40 +311%
Far Cry New Dawn	7 −514%	40−45 +514%
Forza Horizon 4	34 −200%	100−110 +200%
Hitman 3	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −186%	80−85 +186%
Metro Exodus	18 −200%	50−55 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 −153%	40−45 +153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14 −343%	62 +343%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −131%	35−40 +131%
Watch Dogs: Legion	41 −95.1%	80−85 +95.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −200%	35−40 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −350%	18 +350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10 −220%	30−35 +220%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −200%	21 +200%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −292%	100−110 +292%
Hitman 3	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	11 −627%	80−85 +627%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12 −342%	53 +342%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 −225%	26 +225%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +193%	15 −193%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−291%

40−45
+291%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −288%	30−35 +288%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1300%	80−85 +1300%
Hitman 3	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −220%	30−35 +220%
Metro Exodus	0−1	27−30
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −269%	95−100 +269%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−225%

24−27
+225%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Hitman 3	0−1	10−12
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −7900%	80−85 +7900%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−180%

14−16
+180%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 +0%	13 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	37 +0%	37 +0%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

14−16

+0%

14−16

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

16−18

+0%

16−18

+0%

This is how RX Vega 10 and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

Arc A370M is 129% faster in 1080p
Arc A370M is 250% faster in 1440p
Arc A370M is 240% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 10 is 193% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A370M is 7900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX Vega 10 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
Arc A370M is ahead in 64 tests (93%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.23	13.26
Recency	8 January 2019	30 March 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	35 Watt

RX Vega 10 has 250% lower power consumption.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has a 213.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A370M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 10 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.