GeForce GT 620M vs Radeon RX 9060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9060 9060 XT 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT 16GB 9070 9070 GRE 9070 GRE 16 GB 9070 XT
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
615 GT 415M GT 420M GT 425M GT 435M GT 520M GT 525M GT 540M GT 550M GT 620M GT 630M GT 640M LE

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9060 with GeForce GT 620M, including specs and performance data.

RX 9060
2025
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
43.95
+4167%

RX 9060 outperforms 620M by a whopping 4167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 9060 RX 9060
GT 620M GT 620M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking981151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.645.29
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNavi 44GF108
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 August 2025 (less than a year ago)23 August 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179296
Core clock speed1700 MHzUp to 625 MHz
Boost clock speed2990 MHz715 MHz
Number of transistors29,700 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate334.910.56
Floating-point processing power21.43 TFLOPS0.2534 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs11216
Ray Tracing Cores28no data
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 BitUp to 128bit
Memory clock speed2518 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth322.3 GB/sUp to 28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1aNo outputs
HDMI++
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 API
Shader Model6.85.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.21.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 9060 43.95
+4167%
GT 620M 1.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 9060 18040
+4135%
Samples: 42
GT 620M 426
Samples: 698

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1500−1550
+4067%
36
−4067%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how RX 9060 and GT 620M compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 is 4067% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 38 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 43.95 1.03
Recency 5 August 2025 23 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 15 Watt

RX 9060 has a 4167% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

GT 620M, on the other hand, has 780% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 9060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 620M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 620M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
RX 7650 GRE Radeon RX 7650 GRE
GT 620M GeForce GT 620M
vs
HD 7650M Radeon HD 7650M
RX 9060 Radeon RX 9060
vs
GTX 1080 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
Quadro M600M M600M
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
GT 735M GT 735M
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
R7 M260X R7 M260X
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
GeForce 920MX 920MX
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
R5 M335 R5 M335
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
R9 Nano R9 Nano
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
R7 250 R7 250
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
RX 560 Mobile 560 Mobile
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
GTX 1080 11Gbps GTX 1080 11Gbps
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
RX 550 550

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 56 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 559 votes

Rate GeForce GT 620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9060 or GeForce GT 620M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.