Radeon 8060S vs RX 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 8060S and Radeon 8060S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 8060S
2025
40.79

8060S outperforms RX 8060S by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10898
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameno dataStrix Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402560
Core clock speedno data1295 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz2335 MHz
Number of transistorsno data34,000 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data4 nm
Texture fill rateno data373.6
Floating-point processing powerno data11.96 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 8060S 40.79
Radeon 8060S 42.14
+3.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 8060S 40164
Radeon 8060S 40732
+1.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 8060S 96996
Radeon 8060S 96996

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 8060S 26826
Radeon 8060S 27659
+3.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 8060S 148182
Radeon 8060S 164040
+10.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
−28.2%
132
+28.2%
1440p51
−54.9%
79
+54.9%
4K35
−48.6%
52
+48.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
−2.7%
230−240
+2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
−2.3%
85−90
+2.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−1.5%
130−140
+1.5%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+0%
215
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Far Cry 5 96
−10.4%
106
+10.4%
Fortnite 170−180
−2.8%
180−190
+2.8%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−3.2%
160−170
+3.2%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−55.8%
201
+55.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−2.5%
160−170
+2.5%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
−2.3%
85−90
+2.3%
Valorant 230−240
−2.1%
240−250
+2.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−1.5%
130−140
+1.5%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Far Cry 5 95
−9.5%
104
+9.5%
Fortnite 170−180
−2.8%
180−190
+2.8%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−3.2%
160−170
+3.2%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
−41.1%
182
+41.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+0%
127
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
−4%
100−110
+4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−2.5%
160−170
+2.5%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
−2.3%
85−90
+2.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−46.3%
218
+46.3%
Valorant 230−240
−2.1%
240−250
+2.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−1.5%
130−140
+1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Far Cry 5 92
−5.4%
97
+5.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−3.2%
160−170
+3.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−2.5%
160−170
+2.5%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
−2.3%
85−90
+2.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
−12.9%
114
+12.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
−2.8%
180−190
+2.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
−3.5%
290−300
+3.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−4.9%
60−65
+4.9%
Valorant 260−270
−1.9%
270−280
+1.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−2.9%
100−110
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−4.1%
50−55
+4.1%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+12.4%
89
−12.4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−3.3%
120−130
+3.3%
Sons of the Forest 60−65
−3.1%
65−70
+3.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−6.3%
85
+6.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
−3.6%
110−120
+3.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−2.6%
35−40
+2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+15.8%
57
−15.8%
Valorant 250−260
−2.8%
250−260
+2.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−3%
65−70
+3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+12.2%
49
−12.2%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−5%
80−85
+5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−5.2%
60−65
+5.2%
Sons of the Forest 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−3.6%
55−60
+3.6%

This is how RX 8060S and Radeon 8060S compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8060S is 28% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8060S is 55% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8060S is 49% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 8060S is 16% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 8060S is 56% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 8060S is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
  • Radeon 8060S is ahead in 48 tests (81%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.79 42.14

Radeon 8060S has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 8060S and Radeon 8060S.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 8060S
Radeon RX 8060S
AMD Radeon 8060S
Radeon 8060S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 38 votes

Rate Radeon 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 8060S or Radeon 8060S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.