RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 7700S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX 7700S
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
40.52
+18.8%

Radeon RX 7700S outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking92142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameNavi 33no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484608
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt (75 - 100 Watt TGP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate300.8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 7700S and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed18000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7700S 40.52
+18.8%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 34.11

Radeon RX 7700S outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 7700S 37918
+31.4%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 28847

Radeon RX 7700S outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by 31% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 7700S 24246
+17.9%
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20571

Radeon RX 7700S outperforms RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile by 18% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD122
+22%
100−110
−22%
1440p63
+26%
50−55
−26%
4K42
+20%
35−40
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+30%
100−105
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−105
+25%
80−85
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+22%
100−105
−22%
Hitman 3 100−110
+18.8%
85−90
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+28.3%
120−130
−28.3%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+21.2%
85−90
−21.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+20%
80−85
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 202
+18.8%
170−180
−18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+30%
100−105
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Far Cry 5 65
+30%
50−55
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−105
+25%
80−85
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+22%
100−105
−22%
Hitman 3 100−110
+18.8%
85−90
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+28.3%
120−130
−28.3%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+21.2%
85−90
−21.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+20%
80−85
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+20%
70−75
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+22.5%
120−130
−22.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+20%
75−80
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+22%
100−105
−22%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+28.3%
120−130
−28.3%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+21.2%
85−90
−21.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+20%
70−75
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+20%
80−85
−20%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+20%
65−70
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+26.7%
75−80
−26.7%
Hitman 3 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 81
+24.6%
65−70
−24.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+21.4%
70−75
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+27.1%
70−75
−27.1%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+26.7%
60−65
−26.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 92
+22.7%
75−80
−22.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
Hitman 3 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%

This is how RX 7700S and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is 22% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700S is 26% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700S is 20% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.52 34.11
Recency 5 January 2023 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 115 Watt

The Radeon RX 7700S is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 77 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.